Circa 2005
India Times reports Chennai Floods
(Chennai, Dec 4): More than 500,000 people were affected in this Tamil Nadu capital and its suburbs after rain-fed rivers and lakes inundated almost three-fourths of the city, even as the army was called for relief operations.
Officials said around 230,000 people were evacuated from their homes and lodged in relief camps across the state following heavy rains, brought on by a low pressure system over the Bay of Bengal, since Friday night.
Chief Minister J. Jayalalitha, who surveyed some flood-affected areas Sunday, said relief operations were being undertaken on a war footing. “Overflows in the Adyar and Cooum rivers are being regulated,” she told reporters.
Circa 2008
The Hindu reports Chennai Floods
Rain-related toll rises to 51 in Tamil Nadu
1. 36 lakh people affected; Rs.100 crore to undertake immediate relief work
CHENNAI: As many as 51 persons lost their lives and 1.36 lakh people were affected by the current spell of rain, a briefing issued at a Cabinet meeting has said.
Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi sanctioned Rs.100 crore to undertake immediate relief work.
As many as 1,380 villages were affected and 54,525 persons shifted to safer places. About 2,000 huts were partially damaged, 930 huts completely damaged and 68 heads of cattle perished.
Now, insensitive as this might sound, that’s one way to measure progress, viz., increase in the number of people affected by similar rainy seasons that were almost exactly three years apart. Bravo! Pray someone is asking why this is the case at a more serious and accountable forum.
Shifting gears, I came across the India Times post (shown above) when I googled for Chennai rains in early Dec’08. Shame on India Times for having a post without a proper timestamp.
Reminded me of the United Airlines Stock plummeting debacle of Sep’ 08, when some wise analyst used an outdated report to rate UAL down. Result:
In the span of 10 minutes, 24 million UAL shares changed hands. The stock, trading at $12.45, crashed to $3, according to Nasdaq.
In the India Times story, there is no such fear. The only giveaway that the report is dated is the line on Chief Minister J.Jayalalithaa, who all of us familiar with Tamil Nadu politics know is not the current incumbent. That said, Times could have done The Hindu (and, other papers) a favor by passing their rain report template so that all one has to do is change the number of people affected and the name of the Chief Minister every once in a while. The rest of the report, I am afraid, could very well be set in stone for the foreseeable future of Tamil Nadu.



A few years back I came across this quote in an issue (














![Yíhé Yuán, del Sol [2/2]](http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7018/6598785693_871de66fff_s.jpg)
![Yíhé Yuán, del Sol [1/2]](http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7005/6598770751_501e709ac3_s.jpg)









